CRPC JUDGEMENTS

 Share

You said:
please list out supreme court landmark judgements related to following sections of CRPC : 53, 53A, 54, 291, 292, 293.and 311A # Crpc 53, 53A,54, 291, 293, 311A. # BNSS 51 doctor examination at request of police, 52 rape accused dr exam, 53 dr exam of arrested, 326 FM DEPOSES, 329 govt expert report, 349 magistrate to order give specimen sign.
ChatGPT said:

Here are some Supreme Court of India landmark judgments related to the sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) mentioned in the image:

CrPC Section 53: Examination of the accused by a medical practitioner

  • Selvi & Ors vs. State of Karnataka (2010): The Supreme Court ruled on the permissibility of conducting tests like narco-analysis, polygraph, and brain mapping, emphasizing the right against self-incrimination.

CrPC Section 53A: Examination of a person accused of rape by a medical practitioner

  • Dhananjay Chatterjee Alias Dhana vs. State of W.B. (1994): Highlighted the importance of medical examination in rape cases and the procedures to be followed, stressing the necessity of scientific evidence.

CrPC Section 54: Examination of arrested person by medical officer

  • Sheela Barse vs. State of Maharashtra (1983): The Supreme Court stressed the importance of medical examination of arrested persons, particularly in cases of custodial violence.

CrPC Section 291: Deposition of medical witness in writing

  • State of Punjab vs. Naib Din (2001): The Court allowed written medical reports to be admissible as evidence when oral examination is not possible, ensuring the credibility of medical testimony.

CrPC Section 292: Evidence of officers of Mint or expert in foreign exchange

  • State of Maharashtra vs. Natwarlal Damodardas Soni (1980): This case dealt with the expertise and authority of mint officers in matters related to counterfeit currency.

CrPC Section 293: Reports of certain government scientific experts

  • Dr. Sohani Suresh Pujari vs. State of Maharashtra (2010): The Supreme Court upheld the admissibility of expert reports provided by government authorities under Section 293, ensuring their role in the judicial process.

CrPC Section 311A: Magistrate's power to order a person to give specimen signatures or handwriting

  • S. Noor Mohammed vs. State of Karnataka (2016): The Supreme Court allowed the use of this section in ordering accused persons to provide handwriting or signature specimens, aiding in evidence collection.

These cases highlight the judicial interpretation of forensic and medical examination provisions, along with the admissibility of expert testimony in the Indian legal system. Let me know if you need a deeper dive into any specific case or section.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

cyber security digital forensics trends

S1-3 MSc CRIME SCENE MANAGEMENT : SHARADA AVADHANAM